Why Now Capabilities Architecture Demo Domains Stance About Contact
Network active N=0
Stealth Mode · Active Development

SwarmGuard

Built to resist. Designed to adapt. Distributed to outlast.

Powered by SIL Swarm Integrity Layer
Continue
SIMULATION
The Architecture SIL

No central authority. So no weak link to break. Every decision goes through peers before any action runs.

Why Now

Autonomy is moving faster than resilience.

We still judge autonomous systems on peak performance in ideal conditions. But the real test is what happens when the network fragments, when the signal drops, when a node stops responding.

01

Contested is the new normal.

Jamming. Signal degradation. Denied infrastructure. Partial connectivity. These aren't edge cases anymore — they're the work environment.

02

A central authority is a breaking point.

Centralizing coordination concentrates the risk. When the center goes down, the mission goes with it.

03

Survival matters more than performance.

Most systems optimize execution in the nominal scenario. SwarmGuard starts from the opposite: what has to hold when things go wrong.

Capabilities SIL

Three things we refused to take for granted.

SIL™ rests on three primitives. They're what lets the swarm hold when everything else gives way.

Architecture
Patented
Validation
Hardware
Origin
UQTR · 2025
01

Topology

The swarm isn't locked into a fixed formation. It reorganizes as the mission evolves or as nodes drop out.

  • Adaptive geometry
  • In-flight reconfiguration
  • Loss tolerance
02

Consensus

Before a critical action runs, peers have to agree and sign off on it. The quorum required adjusts to the situation.

  • Cryptographic validation
  • Adaptive quorum
  • Partition tolerance
03

Trust

Every node is watched continuously. When behavior drifts, the swarm catches it, isolates the node, and continues without it.

  • Continuous calibration
  • Automatic isolation
  • Collective inference
Architecture SIL

Not a drone. Not an AI. The layer above.

SIL™ doesn't fly anything and doesn't decide alone. It makes sure decisions come up, get validated, and are signed before anything executes. Above the hardware. Above the models. Above the platforms.

05
Mission Applications
Reconnaissance, inspection, logistics, fleet behaviors.
04
Mission AI
Recommendations, planning, prediction, local interpretation.
SIL
Swarm Integrity Layer
The distributed decision authority. Validates, arbitrates, secures every critical action before execution.
SwarmGuard decides
02
Mesh Communications
Resilient peer-to-peer connectivity. Degradation tolerated.
01
Hardware Platforms
Drones, robots, sensors. Heterogeneous. Replaceable.

Hardware can be replaced. Coordination can't. That's where the strategic value lives.

AI proposes. SwarmGuard decides.
No critical action without peer validation.

Live Demonstration

Three scenarios. One single truth.

No simulation. No slides. Four nodes in continuous operation, stress-tested across three operational scenarios: nominal operation, node failure, and compromised node.

SwarmGuard demonstration preview
Watch demonstration
2:57 · 1080p · YouTube
3
Operational scenarios
Nominal · Failure · Compromise
47
Decisions processed
Across all three scenarios
45
Validated by consensus
Reached by trusted nodes
2
Anomalies isolated
Detected within 6 seconds
96%
Overall success rate
Mission continuity maintained

Implementation details available under NDA after mutual qualification.

Domains

Where autonomy isn't allowed to fail.

Defense

Where the command link isn't guaranteed. Where it can be jammed at any moment.

  • Distributed ISR
  • Electronic warfare
  • Contested logistics
Primary Market

Aerospace

Inspections in remote areas. Mapping under degraded conditions. If one aircraft drops out, the work has to keep going.

  • Infrastructure inspection
  • Autonomous mapping
  • BVLOS operations
Expansion

Industry 4.0

Robots that need to coordinate without a central supervisor. Sites too remote to depend on a stable link.

  • Warehouse logistics
  • Coordinated robotics
  • Remote operations
Horizon
Stance

What we do. What we'll refuse to do.

In defense, you have to know where you stand before someone asks. Here's where we stand.

For democracies.

Canada and its allies. Not authoritarian regimes, not sanctioned states, not non-state actors. This line doesn't move based on the contract.

Humans keep the call.

Our tech coordinates. It doesn't decide on lethal use by itself. On anything that risks a life, a human signs off.

We follow the rules, even when it slows us down.

Export controls, Quebec's Loi 25, CCCS requirements. We won't cut corners to close a deal faster.

Open about the posture, closed about the mechanics.

We say publicly what we stand for. The sensitive technical details, we keep. That line is clear and it isn't up for negotiation.

This isn't a marketing page. It's a filter. If it matches you, let's talk. If not, we're probably not the right partner — and that's fine.

The next war won't be won on performance alone.
It'll come down to what holds when everything else gives way.

Working on a system that can't fail? Let's talk.

contact@swarmguard.tech
Saint-Hubert, Quebec — South Shore of Montréal
USPTO 63/919,483 + CIP
The founder
Dr. Mahamat Moussa Dogoumi

Three years on it: how to keep a swarm coherent when a node falls, lies, or is attacked. A lot of dead-ends before finding what holds. The thesis gave the answer. SwarmGuard puts it in the field.

PhD · UQTR 2025 USPTO · 63/919,483 + CIP 100% · IP Owner